|
Archive for the ‘Legal Research’ Category
Ignorance of the Law is NO EXCUSE!
Using On-Line Legal Research
Find the Law that Controls the Judge!
You cannot win without controlling judges.
You cannot control judges unless you research and cite controlling “legal authority” for every point you seek to make on the court’s record!
The judge is not the authority!
You must make it crystal clear on the court’s record that the judge will be reversed on appeal if he rules against you.
Otherwise, a judge is free to ignore everything you say and rule any way he pleases in spite of what the law and facts may prove to the contrary … because he knows he will not be reversed on appeal.
The appeal process will not give you another bite at the proverbial apple. Either you make your points with the trial judge by researching and properly citing controlling“legal authority”, or you run the risk of losing your case and being stuck with the judge’s unjust decision forever!
Don’t believe me?
Go tell a judge what your personal opinions are about the law and how you think he should rule in your case, and see how far it gets you!
The only opinions that count in court are the written opinions of appellate court justices who stand in judgment of trial level judges and have power to reverse them if they disagree with appellate decisions in any way!
Your opinions (no matter how clever or persuasive) count for nothing in court.
You must clearly show the judge on the record by citing official legal authorities from appellate decisions, exactly what will happen if the judges rules against you!
Controlling judges is what wins lawsuits!
You control judges by making clear on the record what higher level appellate courts have ruled in the past, what opinions those higher courts have passed down, and why the higher courts will reverse the trial judge’s orders if he rules contrary to what the appellate courts require.
You must tell the judge why you should win – by citing official legal authorities the judge is required to obey:
- court rules,
- constitutional provisions,
- statutes,
- codes, and
- most importantly the opinions of higher courts that clarify what those rules, constitutional provisions, statutes, and codes really mean!
What you think these things mean doesn’t count! Trust me!
How you choose to read and interpret those things doesn’t count.
The only thing that counts is how the controlling appellate courts read and interpret them, and what they say those things mean in regard to the facts of your case.
The other side will cite legal authorities for their case.
You must do the same … if you want to win.
If you’ve wandered through a law library in search of legal authority, you were probably amazed to find crowded shelves stuffed with volumes of similar-looking books differing only by the mysterious numbers printed on their spines. Books that give no hint which one might hide the key to unlock the judge’s favor in your case.
In a well-stocked law library there are thousands of books.
You cannot possibly read them all to find what you seek, and even the indexes, appendices, and annotations are a complex nightmare that requires years of experience to master.
On the other hand, on-line legal research is easy.
We show you how in our course.
Learn how to use on-line legal research and how to cite case-winning legal authority with the affordable, official, step-by-step 24-hour Jurisdictionary self-help course!
So easy an 8th grader can do it!
Lawsuit Anatomy Explained
Learn lawsuit anatomy by spelling: CAT.
The 3 basic steps of every lawsuit are:.
- Complaint
- Answer
- Trial
Start here, and you’ll soon be operating like a pro in court, controlling judges and defeating crooked lawyers.
Of course, there’s much more to winning, but it’s all easy if you start with basic anatomy: CAT.
C = Complaint … Where every case begins. Plaintiff complains by filing a Complaint. He alleges (1) what duty the defendant breached, (2) how the defendant breached the duty, and (3) how the plaintiff suffered damages (or is threatened with damages) as a direct result.
A = Answer … Where defendant responds to plaintiff’s Complaint by filing an Answer and Affirmative Defenses. In his Answer he admits or denies (or claims he lacks enough knowledge to admit or deny) each separate allegation of the plaintiff’s Complaint. In his Affirmative Defenses he alleges facts that (if he can prove them) will relieve him of his obligation to plaintiff.
T = Trial … Where the judge (or jury) decides the final verdict by examiningadmissible evidence, using plain old common sense to decide which facts presented are true, weighing each side’s evidence to see which side has the greater weight of evidence, and then applying the law to determine who wins.
Plaintiffs file Complaints.
Defendants file Answers (and essential “Affirmative Defenses”, as you will learn in my course.
Judges and juries examine the facts and law at trial to decide who wins.
During the process Motions and Discovery Tools are used by both sides to convince the court who should win.
This is where the fight is – not at trial.
Every winnable case can be won before trial, if you use my case-winning tactics … all explained in my affordable, official, 24-hour Jurisdictionary “How to Win in Court” self-help course.
For example, there are 3 Motions the defendant can use to avoid filing an answer:
- Motion to Dismiss
- Motion to Strike
- Motion for More Definite Statement
All explained in the course.
At any time after the Complaint is filed, either side may use 5 discovery tools to get facts that may lead to admissible evidence:
- Admissions
- Production
- Interrogatories
- Depositions
- Subpoenas and other court orders
Also explained fully in my affordable self-help course.
That’s the Anatomy of Every Lawsuit!
It really IS this simple!
The Pro Se Problem
( From “How to Win in Court” Course )
Click or Call 866-LAW-EASY Toll Free!
Why Pro Se Litigants Have a Hard Time.
Many pro se people are winning.
Unfortunately, a great number who should be winning are losing … needlessly!
Going to court without a lawyer is a growing phenomenon. Whether it’s the high cost of legal fees or growing distrust of lawyers in general, the trend is for more people to fightwithout lawyers
The American Bar Association reports nearly 1/2 of all pro se folks believe lawyers care more about their own self-interest than their client’s rights.
If you go by calls and emails Jurisdictionary receives, there’s good reason for this! Lawyers who bail at the last minute. Lawyers who don’t know what they’re doing. And, worst of all, lawyers wishing to curry favor with judges, afraid to stand up to the buffalo in the black robe and demand their clients’ rights by making timely objections and threatening appeal.
60% of pro se people say they can’t afford a lawyer.
20% say they simply don’t want to spend the money.
Nearly ½ of all court proceedings in the U.S. involve at least one pro se party … and too many of them are losing all because they don’t yet know the “rules of the game” or how to play to win!
Good people who should be winning are losing needlessly simply because they were never taught what it takes to win!
Ever ask yourself, “Why?”
Ever wonder if there might be a sinister reason nothing about law is taught to our children in schools supported by our tax dollars?
Who benefits from your legal ignorance?
You have a Constitutional right to justice.
You have a Constitutional right to go to court and win pro se!
Your rights were paid for by the blood of those who gave the ultimate sacrifice for you!
BUT, THE KEYS TO JUSTICE HAVE BEEN HIDDEN FROM YOU – UNTIL NOW!
Pro se people too often do not get justice.
Why?
We at Jurisdictionary receive emails every day complaining there’s a judicial “conspiracy” against pro se litigants.
Let’s examine facts:
- Most pro se people know nothing about the official Rules of Evidence that control the judge and all parties and their lawyers.
- Most pro se people know nothing about the official Rules of Procedure that control the judge and all parties and their lawyers.
- Most pro se people have no idea what “due process” really is.
- Most pro se people can’t recognize the opposing lawyer’s dirty tricks.
- Most pro se people assume what “admissible evidence” is and don’t know what stuff isn’t.
- Most pro se people draft their pleadings and motions incorrectly – usually with far too many words!
- Most pro se people don’t know why it’s vital to write proposed orders for the judge to sign.
- Most pro se people don’t know why, when, or how to make effective objections in court.
- Most pro se people don’t understand what facts are critical to winning a case and what facts are of no consequence.
- Most pro se people muddy the legal waters with court-confusing insignificance.
- Most pro se people don’t know how to find and cite controlling appellate opinions in support of their motions.
- Most pro se people don’t arrange in advance of every proceeding to have a court stenographer present, so they can control the judge.
- Most pro se people waste valuable court time with non-essentials, fail to appreciate the needs of others who have other problems to bring before the court and, as a consequence, tend to make judges dread pro se cases and hate pro se people.
BUT!
Pro se people who know what I explain so simply in my affordable, official, 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary “How to Win in Court” self-help course winning consistently and getting compliments from judges and even opposing lawyers.
It’s so easy to learn how to do things the right way!
If you and friends were playing a game of basketball, and some bystander wanted to play but didn’t know the rules … how would you feel when he or she kept fouling and arguing he or she has a right to do as he or she pleases because she doesn’t know the rules?
Put yourself in the judges’ robes!
Many years ago, after winning a motion, an older judge asked me to stay behind after the parties left. He took me aside and said simply: “I want you to know that the case before yours today was to protect a little girl who’s grandfather thinks it’s fun to extinguish cigars on her legs.” I knew what he wanted me to know, and I never forgot. Other people’s case are serious, too.
Pro se people who know what I explain in my affordable, official, 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary “How to Win in Court” self-help course don’t waste the court’s time and get justice by knowing the rules and how to use them tactically to control the judge and opposing counsel.
Winners learn the rules and how to use them!
If you want to win, get my affordable, official, 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary “How to Win in Court” self-help course.
|
Affordable 24-hour Step-by-Step Self-Help Course Includes: Ask anyone who has our course … “Jurisdictionary Works!” |
Content In Their Containers: The birth of a new form of legal publication and how it will be sold
“Content, Not Containers!” is the brief comment Jason Wilson added to his tweet that calls attention to CALI Director of Content Development Sarah Glassmeyer’s recent CALI Spotlight Blog post. Content is certainly important but the reality is content is always…
The 6 Types of Lawsuit Complaints
Know the 6 types of lawsuit complaints.
Every lawsuit starts with a complaint.
See how easy it is?
- The plaintiff in the chart sues Defendant A and Defendant B.
- Defendant B counter-claims against Plaintiff.
- Defendant A cross-claims against Defendant B.
- Defendant B counter-cross-claims against Defendant A.
- Defendant A files a third-party complaint against Third Party Defendant.
- Third-Party Defendant counter-claims against Defendant A.
That’s all there is to it!
See how easy it is?
Lawsuits are “ridiculously easy-to-understand” once the Jurisdictionary step-by-step self-help course shows you how the parts fit together.
If you have a lawyer, you’ll know what your lawyer should be doing!
If you don’t have a lawyer, you’ll know what it takes to win!
The course offers many diagrams just like this plus charts, sample forms, simplified explanations, and practical tactics that give you power to win … with or without a lawyer!
It’s not rocket science.
It’s straight-forward once you see the step-by-step procedures and how they’re controlled by a simple set of rules an average 8th grader can understand.
Everyone knows a baseball game has at least 9 innings.
Everyone knows the visiting team is first to bat.
Everyone knows the batter goes back to the dugout after 3 strikes.
It’s simple.
It’s baseball.
It’s America!
Lawsuits are just as easy as baseball, once you see them with the explanations and examples the course provides.
Not many people know how simple lawsuits really are. My profession has kept this knowledge secret from you on purpose!
It shouldn’t be that way!
Now YOU can know how to win … with or without a lawyer!
Google Undocumented Search Operators Out of Date and Updated
In response to the Google undocumented operators post from Monday, Gary Price from INFODocket, as does Carol Ebbinghouse in a comment to that post notes that the Googleguide pages are not up to date. Gary reports that the pages haven’t…
