| You cannot win without controlling judges!
And, you cannot control judges unless you research and cite controlling “legal authority” for every legal argument you seek to make on the court’s record! The judge is not the legal authority! Don’t let any judge scare you into believing otherwise! The law is the law, not the judge! You must make it crystal clear on the court’s record that the judge will be reversed on appeal if he rules against you … because your legal research found appellate court opinions that control his jurisdictionand his decisions! Read the testimonials ⇒ If you don’t do what the official Jurisdictionary course teaches, the judge will be free to ignore everything you say and rule any way he pleases in spite of what the law and facts prove to the contrary …because he knows he cannot be reversed on appeal. The appeal process will not give you another bite at the proverbial apple. Either you make your points with the trial judge by citing “legal authority” that controls him, or run the risk of losing your case and being stuck with the decision forever! Don’t believe me? Go tell a judge what your personal opinions are about the law and how you think he should rule in your case, and see how far it gets you! How you choose to read and interpret the law doesn’t count a bit … not even a tiny bit! The only thing that counts is how the appellate courts read and interpret the law, and what they say the law means in regard to the facts of your case. The other side will cite legal authorities for their case. You must do the same … if you want to win. If you’ve wandered through a law library in search of legal authority, you were probably amazed to find crowded shelves stuffed with volumes of similar-looking books, differing only by the mysterious numbers printed on their spines. Books that give no hint which one might hide the key to unlock the judge’s favor in your case. In a well-stocked law library there are thousands of books. You cannot possibly read them all to find what you seek, and even the indexes, appendices, and annotations are a complex nightmare that requires years of experience to master. On the other hand, on-line legal research is easy. We show you how to do it in our official course. Learn how to use on-line legal research and how to cite case-winning legal authority in my affordable step-by-step 24-hour official Jurisdictionary self-help course! Know how to control the judge – or you will lose! These “Tips & Tactics” newsletters are only the very tip of the iceberg of lawsuit knowledge you need to win. If you don’t already have my 24-hour step-by-step self-help course, go to my website and order now! Learn how to research and cite … so you can WIN! Dr. Frederick David Graves, JD |
Dr. Laura reinventing herself again?
I wrote about Dr. Laura Schlessinger awhile back, comparing her to Dr. Toni Grant. So did Betty Bowers, which is also worth recalling. If you want to know who Betty Bowers is, she’s explained here. Meanwhile, we will wait with baited breath for the umpteenth coming of Dr. Laura, but in what shape? She claims she will be giving up her radio show. Back to books, or TV reality appearances? A game show? A Judge on America’s Got Talent? (I can think of others who have done this.) Perhaps she will go back to this, although I think it’s got a bit past her.
Her callers will have to find some other problem-seeker offering personalized answers. Someone with a little sensitivity, someone who will know whether it is ok to flaunt the "N" word. I do feel a tiny bit sorry for her, truth to tell. For her life as of now will be taken over by others not of her choosing, and I know how that feels.
Posted in COMMENTARY