RSS
 

Posts Tagged ‘theory’

Control Corrupt Courts!

16 Mar

( From “How to Win in Court” Course )
Click or Call 866-LAW-EASY Toll Free!

Instead of writing a long Tips & Tactics newsletter this week, I thought I’d show you how to control corrupt courts!

You won’t believe me, but most lawyers (and nearly all law school professors) don’t have a clue what it takes to win in the real world.

That’s right!

Law school teaches all sorts of things … but not how to control judges nor how to overcome scheming tricks of crooked lawyers!

Law school is not the real world. Most professors never practiced law. Moreover, to keep their jobs they must be too politically correct to teach law students how some judges are biased or corrupt and how to overcome the scheming tricks of crooked lawyers.

What law students learn in law school is legal theory and the fundamentals required to pass the Bar Exam … not much practical knowledge!

Theory doesn’t win lawsuits.

You need to win your lawsuit!

You need to know what’s important, what’s not, and how to focus your energy where it belongs: getting court orders!

Most lawyers never learn this.

All the posturing, big words, flamboyant behavior, lapel-thumbing, courtroom strutting accomplishes nothing!

The only thing that matters is the ink flowing from a judge’s pen when he signs court orders.

You must know how to control corrupt judges and overcome crooked lawyers. You must be able to re-direct the judge’s bias and the lawyers’ sneaky tricks!

There’s a reason why lawyer jokes proliferate.

There’s a reason why so many complain about high-minded, high-handed judges who ignore the law.

Political correctness prevents justice!

Winning lawsuits is a brutal, no-holds-barred, axe fight!

Jurisdictionary is your axe!

www.Jurisdictionary.com

 

 

Affordable 24-hour Step-by-Step Self-Help Course Includes:

5-hour video CD simplifies the process of litigation
2 audio CDs present practical tactics and procedures
15 in-depth tutorials on a 4th CD lay out the basics
Free EasyGuide to the Rules of Court
Instant On-Line Access while CDs are in the Mail
Still Only $249 … plus $7.50 Priority Mail Shipping & Handling
Save legal fees! Control judges!
Defeat crooked lawyers!

www.Jurisdictionary.com

Ask anyone who has our course … “Jurisdictionary Works!”

Call Toll Free for details: 866-Law-Easy

 

Types of Lawsuit Complaints

28 May
Know the 6 types of lawsuit complaints.Types of Complaint - Jurisdictionary

Every lawsuit begins with a complaint filed by one or more plaintiffs.

Click on the small image to access full-size PDF chart!(You’ll need Adobe Reader. If you don’t already have it, you can get it FREE at www.Adobe.com.)

See how easily this is explained?

Making lawsuits “ridiculously easy-to-understand” is why Jurisdictionary is popular with litigants in every state of the U.S. and in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, England, Ireland, India, and Puerto Rico … people with and people without a lawyer!

If you have a lawyer, my course will save you thousands in legal fees, because you’ll know what your lawyer should be doing to earn his or her fees!

If you don’t have a lawyer, my course will show you the proper method to win your case … step-by-step!

This diagram in printable form is included in my official, affordable, step-by-step, 24-hour Jurisdictionary course that includes many other diagrams, charts, sample forms, and simplified explanations that demonstrate how to use the rules of court with practical tactics that give you the power to win … with or without a lawyer!

If you don’t already have my course, order now.

A picture is worth a thousand words, and this diagram could be worththousands of dollars to YOU if you learn what it teaches and apply it in your court case!

1. The plaintiff in this simple chart sues Defendant A and Defendant B.

2. Defendant B counter-claims against Plaintiff.

3. Defendant A cross-claims against Defendant B.

4. Defendant B counter-cross-claims against Defendant A.

5. Defendant A also files a third-party complaint against Third Party Defendant.

6. Third-Party Defendant counter-claims against Defendant A.

There are variations on each of these that you’ll learn about in my simplified step-by-step course, but each of the variations is really just a type of one of these shown in the diagram.

See how simple lawsuits really are?

In some cases the complaint is called a “petition” and the person filing it is called the “petitioner”, but the types are the same. Most cases involve plaintiffs and defendants, but in actions that sound principally in “equity” (explained in my course) the plaintiff is called a petitioner, and the responding party is called a respondent. Otherwise, case structure is the same.Learn from Jurisdictionary step-by-step

Knowledge overcomes fear.

Knowledge brings confidence.

Confidence yields courage and determination.

Couple these together the way I teach in my course, and you have the winning formula for success in court!

If you must fear something, fear not knowing how to use the rules of court to win!

The rules are on YOUR side. Once you learn what I teach about using them tactically and strategically to control courtroom corruption, the rules give power to overcome your opponent and corrupt judges.

Cursing the darkness does no good at all.

There will be darkness.

There will be corruption.

There will be dirty tricks and crooked maneuvers by the other side.

There will be judges who are biased against you.

BUT!

The knowledge you need is mostly common sense.

It is nothing like differential calculus or quantum theory.

It’s all straight-forward, step-by-step procedure that is regulated by rules any average 8th grader can learn.

REMEMBER: The hardest part of winning in court is having a clear idea what’s happening and why!

Learn how the Justice System works … step-by-step!

Know how each simple step in the process fits together and how increasing your knowledge of the details of each simple step in the process will bring you closer to the victory and justice you deserve!

Everyone knows there are only 9 innings in a baseball game (unless the teams are tied at the bottom of the 9th). Everyone knows the visiting team gets to be first to bat. Everyone knows a batter has to go back to the dugout after 3 strikes. It’s simple. It’s baseball. It’s America!

But, how many of you or your friends know how simple a lawsuit is?

How many parts does a lawsuit have?

How do the separate parts fit together?

Not many people know how simple lawsuits really are!

Because you were never taught – and my profession has kept this valuable knowledge from you on purpose – most of you are at the mercy of lawyers!

It shouldn’t be that way here in America!

So, I created my step-by-step Jurisdictionary course.

Now everyone can know how to win in court!

Learn how to state your position clearly in writing using properly-drafted pleadings, motions, and memoranda.

Learn why, how, and when to object in court properly with solid grounds for objections the court cannot ignore.

Learn how to examine your own witnesses, using direct examination when you cannot use leading questions.

Learn how to cross-examine your opponent’s witnesses in a way that gets answers you need, instead of alienating witnesses with leading questions that pry unnecessarily.

Gain judges’ RESPECT by demonstrating you know how to follow the official rules and won’t be wasting valuable court time or trying judges’ patience with a bizarre legal theory you learned about in an email!

Only the rules rule.

Nothing else works!

Knowing the rules of litigation (the rules of evidence and the rules of procedure) and how to use them properly is how you win favor with judges!

Winning favor with judges is a good thing!

Flattery will get you nowhere.

Using complex legal language you barely understand will get you nowhere.

Trying to trick the other side will get you nowhere.

Knowing how to use the rules will get you victory!

You will impress judges and gain favor with the court by using the easy-to-learn tactics and procedures I explain in my 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary course.

I make it so easy an average 8th grader can understand it all and apply the principles effectively to win in court.

If you don’t know the rules and how to use them, if you waste the court’s valuable time with arguments that don’t hold “legal water”, if you object but don’t know the grounds for your objections, and continue to irritate the judge and waste the court’s time by not knowing how things are done in court, you cannot expect the judge to be favorable to your cause.Learn from Jurisdictionary step-by-step

When I first started learning 25 years ago what I make easy for you to learn with my affordableofficial Jurisdictionary self-help course, the business of law was often confusing and overwhelming at times. Getting my feet wet as a fledgling lawyer, I often had to go up against lawyers who had as much experience as I have now, and they cut me no slack. The advantage I had over younger lawyers (I didn’t start my practice until age 42) was common sense and life experience. I learned quickly how to avoid traps and tricks of my opponents.

In the past quarter-century I learned what it takes to win.

Now you can know what I learned in those 25 years of fighting in the courthouse trenches!

It’s not all about the law, you see!

It’s about knowing how to use the rules!

You can know the “law” about the facts of your case. You can cite and recite it backward and forward. You can convince your friends and family members that you have the law “on your side”.

But!

If you don’t yet know what I explain in my affordable and increasingly popular 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary course, you will still lose!

I WILL SHOW YOU HOW TO WIN!

Far too many good people lose in court because they don’t know how to control the lawyer on the other side or the black-robed judge on the bench. They may, indeed, have the “law on their side”, but if they don’t know how to control a deposition (for just one small example) or when to proceed to deposition or how to draft a proper motion or why it’s important to make courtroom objections (for just a few additional examples) they lose … needlessly!

Would you pay $249 to win your case?

My 3-years at law school cost tens of thousands. And, there’s no price you can put on my 25 years of experience defeating crooked lawyers, controlling corrupt judges, and winning critical battles in-the-trenches for my clients!

My education and experience can be yours!

It’s all in my affordable and increasingly popular 24-hour step-by-stepofficial Jurisdictionary course.

If you don’t already have my course, get it now!

If you have it and haven’t yet studied all 4 CDs, get to work learning, before some crooked lawyer or corrupt judge throws you under the proverbial bus!

You must make an effort … if you want to win!

Spend just 24-hours with Jurisdictionary to discover the secrets my profession doesn’t want you to know!

Master procedural law and the methods that win!

Just having “the law on your side” is not enough!

If you don’t know “how to play the game”, you’ll lose!


Once you know what Jurisdictionaryteaches, you’ll never again fall into the trap of thinking that knowing “substantive law” is enough.

Why be tricked by other members of my profession?

Learn how to win favor with judges.

Learn procedural law: The Rules of Evidence and the Rules of Procedure.

And, learn how to use the rules effectively to win!

Take advantage of my 25 years of experience!

Beware the law firm of Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe!

I go into every case expecting the lawyer on the other side to be a liar and a crook. I anticipate the judge will be biased against me, so I win over the judge by showing that I know the law and how to use the rules correctly!

Go to www.WordWar.com to learn more.

Don’t be tricked by your lack of legal knowledge!

Smart litigants know what Jurisdictionary teaches!

Smart litigants win!

Do YOU want to win?

You really can’t expect to win if you only know what you learn from your in-box, from amateur lawyer wannabe legal gurus, or weekend seminars run by folks who have no law degree or extended courtroom experience.

I’ve been a member of the bar for 25 years!

I know what it takes to win and will show YOU how!

Control the court with Jurisdictionary!

Ask anyone who has my course.

It’s easy to learn … and it works!

www.Jurisdictionary.com

DEMAND YOUR AMERICAN RIGHTS IN THE COURTS!

Learn how and teach EVERYONE ELSE to learn how also!

Dr. Frederick D. Graves

Jurisdictionary

 

 

Online Legal Services-A Revolution that Failed?"

06 Dec

Chrissy Burns, an Australian lawyer produced a PHD thesis in 2007, entitled ‘Online Legal Services-A Revolution that Failed?’, where she argued that Clayton Christensen’s theory of disruptive innovation does not apply to online legal knowledge products and that a "latent market" for legal services really doesn’t exist. Ms Burns is presently Director of IT and Knowledge Management at Blake  Dawson so she brings first hand knowledge to her thesis based on her  work with large law firms. In a recent review of her workby Darryl Mountain, an attorney with expertise in document automation, makes the counter-argument  that Ms Burns focus is purely on large law firms and the corporate legal market and overlooks the documented unmet legal needs of the broad middle class and the disruptive response of non-lawyer providers such as LegalZoom which has served generated over a 1,000,000 wills for consumers during the past five years. Mountain cites other evidence that there is a wide and growing latent market for legal services, that Burns has overlooked. Mountain concludes that, " The legal marketplace has continued to evolve since Burns finished writing in 2007. On the retail side of law practice, the revolution is very much alive and people are beginning to resolve legal problems solely through the use of online legal knowledge products."

Mountain also argues that Burns has defined "online legal services"  too narrowly because her definition is limited to knowledge products that solve legal problems without lawyer assistance or involvement. Such products are stand alone applications, such as "expert systems."

Mountain argues that the better model for thinking about disruptive change is to consider how Internet-based legal technology can work together with legal professionals to increase law firm productivity, maintain profit margins, or result in lower fees. Instead off stand-alone, legal  knowledge products, Mountain argues that technology-assisted legal service is likely to become the more pervasive model in the future. Mountain writes:

"The best solutions are often those that combine people and software, whether the people are lawyers, paralegals, or outsourced personnel. "

His review and Burns’ thesis are both worth reading for those who follow developments in the delivering of legal services online.